Skip to main content

LOOKING FOR SOMETHING?

62fb5f1024529266c6e71c0c0c9ddb3c_XL.jpg

A92.2: The 2009 Standard

Written by Seth Skydel on . Posted in , .

62fb5f1024529266c6e71c0c0c9ddb3c_XL.jpg

The Accredited Standard Committee (ASC) A92.2 Subcommittee for Vehicle Mounted Rotating and Elevating Aerial Devices of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has issued the long-awaited 2009 edition of the American National Standard for Vehicle Mounted Rotating and Elevated Aerial Devices.

Design and construction requirements of the original 1969 edition of A92.2 and its appendix were made a part of OSHA in 1970. Since then, the standard has been reissued in four editions in 1979, 1990 and 2001, and most recently in 2009. The 2009 Draft of the Standard was balloted twice by the committee and by ANSI rules was opened for public comment prior to final approval.

The newly revised A92.2 standard applies to the establishment of criteria for design, manufacture, testing, inspection, installation, maintenance, use, training and operation of vehicle-mounted aerial devices primarily used to position personnel installed on a chassis. The types of devices covered include extensible boom aerial devices, aerial ladders, articulating boom aerial devices, vertical towers or a combination of any of these.

An industry effort, the A92.2 subcommittee was a diverse group of between 30 and 36 individuals representing users and manufacturers. The subcommittee worked on the standard from 2001 until its eventual approval in July 2009.

For much of that time, the subcommittee was led by Gary McAlexander, president of Intercontinental Equipment Company. McAlexander, who joined the A92 revision effort in 1981, was chairman of the A92.2 subcommittee from 2001 until the 2009 revision was approved.

“The ongoing revision process for a standard like A92.2 is important because it ensures the safety of the utility crews that use aerial devices on a daily basis,” McAlexander said. “By reflecting the changes that have occurred in aerial design, work practices and regulations, we can help reduce incidents in real world operations.

“Communication is important in all endeavors,” McAlexander continued, “and in this case the exchange of information between manufacturers and users was especially valuable. This industry effort involving suppliers and utilities has helped ensure that a workable, effective and comprehensive standard is in effect.”

Joshua Chard, Ph.D., director – product & corporate safety at Altec Inc. now serves as chairman of the A92.2 subcommittee that completed its work on the newly revised standard. In June 2010, he covered the standard and its most recent changes at the 57th annual Electric Utility Fleet Managers Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia.

“The 2009 version of the standard contains many evolutionary changes,” Chard explained. “These changes contain the best language that could be agreed upon by the ANSI/ASC Subcommittee and Main Committee. In all cases they are meant to further the standard in its goal, “to prevent accidents associated with the use of Vehicle Mounted Elevating and Rotating Aerial Devices by establishing requirements for design manufacture, installation, maintenance, performance, use and training.”

Key Elements
The following represent some of the key elements of the newly revised ANSI A92.2 standard issued in 2009 that Chard covered in his presentation.

Although the requirements for general training carry over from the 2001 standard, a fourth bullet was added to the requirements for familiarization.

8.12.3 Familiarization – When an operator is directed to operate an aerial device they are not familiar with, the operator, prior to operating, shall be instructed regarding the following items:
1. The location of the manuals.
2. The purpose and function of all controls.
3. Safety devices and operating characteristics specific to the aerial device.
4. Under the direction of a qualified person, the trainee shall operate the aerial device for a sufficient period of time to demonstrate proficiency in the actual operation of the aerial device.

Additionally, the standard discusses the different types of qualified persons who typically operate aerial devices.

APPENDIX F – PRECAUTIONS FOR USE OF AERIAL DEVICES ON OR NEAR ENGERGIZED APPARATUS
Unqualified Person: A person who does not have approval to approach energized lines and apparatus and has received no significant training regarding the electrical hazards involved in the placing of an aerial device, platform occupants and their tools closer to energized lines and facilities than the distances listed.

Qualified Person: A person who has received training, understands and is conversant in the electrical hazards involved in the placing of an aerial device, platform occupants and their tools closer to energized lines and facilities than the distances listed, and has approval to perform the work.

Training of qualified person(s) is the responsibility of the employer or his designated contractor(s) and can be classroom, hands-on or a combination, as deemed appropriate by the employer for the degree of risk involved.

An unqualified person, as an operator, shall not approach energized conductors or facilities that will place the insulating or non-insulating aerial device, the operator and other platform occupants, and their tools, closer to such facilities that the distances shown.

A qualified communications person, as an operator, shall not approach energized conductors or facilities that will place the insulating or non-insulating aerial device, the operator and other platform occupants, and their tools, closer to such facilities than the distances set forth in Part 29 CFR 1910.268 and the National Electrical Safety Code.

A qualified line clearance tree trimmer, as an operator, shall not approach energized conductors or facilities that will place the insulating or non-insulating aerial device, the operator and other occupants, and their tools, closer to such facilities than the distances set forth in Parts 29 CFR 1910.268, 1910.269 or ANSI/ISA Z133.1.

A qualified lineman, as an operator, shall not approach energized conductors or facilities that will place the insulating or non-insulating aerial device, the operator and other platform occupants, and their tools, closer to such facilities than the distances set forth in Part 29 CFR 1910.269 and the National Electrical Safety Code. Higher levels of qualifications are required for electrical linemen to physically contact energized conductors and facilities from Category A, B and C aerial devices.

DEFINITIONS
The definitions section was expanded during the revision process. Of note was a clarification as to the role of the chassis insulating system:

Chassis Insulating System – An insulating system of dielectric components installed between the chassis and the upper insulating boom.

5.2.5 The chassis insulating system may provide some protection for ground personnel should the portion of the aerial device between the upper insulating boom and the chassis insulating system inadvertently contact an energized conductor or apparatus such as a secondary circuit on a distribution system. When provided, the chassis insulating system does not have a voltage rating. Aerial devices with a chassis insulating system shall have means provided to bypass the chassis insulating system during electrical test, or bare-hand use.

Note: Insulating devices when used for bare-hand work (Category A) require shunting of an existing chassis insulating system.

Insulated Insulating Aerial Device – An aerial device with dielectric components designed and tested to meet the specific electrical insulating rating consistent with the manufacturer’s identification plate.

A significant change found in the design of insulated units is a requirement that lower controls be readily accessible in all boom positions and be installed such that an operator is not placed in the electrical path between the aerial device and the ground.

4.3.3 Lower Controls – Lower controls shall be readily accessible in all boom positions and shall provide a means to override the boom positioning upper controls provided the upper control system is intact.

The override mode shall maintain its function while unattended. The lower controls of insulating aerial devices shall be designed in such a manner that an operator is not placed in the electrical path between the aerial device and the ground

Two new requirements for operator aids are a slope indicator and an outrigger interlock device.

4.5.4 Slope Indicator – An indicator(s) shall be provided that is visible to the operator during setup to show whether the aerial device is positioned within limits permitted by the manufacturer. The allowable limits shall be shown on the unit and in the manual. For units designed for mobile operation such an indicator(s) shall be supplied in the cab.

4.5.5 Outrigger Interlock Device – When an aerial device is equipped with outriggers, and their use is required to pass the stability tests of this standard, an interlock device shall be provided that prevents the boom from being operated from the stowed position until the outriggers have been deployed.

Deployment may be sensed when the outriggers meet resistance or by receipt of an indicative response that the outrigger deployment is beyond a predetermined position. The lifting of an outrigger during operation shall not disable boom functions. An interlock override switch may be provided; however, the override mode of operation shall disable automatically.

Note: The operation of outrigger interlocking devices does not assure aerial device stability. It serves only to remind the operator that the outriggers have or have not been deployed. See Section 10.10 (3). Changes were also made to the fall protection anchorage section.

4.9.4 Anchorage(s) for Personal Fall Protection
4.9.4.1 The manufacturer shall provide anchorage(s) on the boom, platform or platform mounting.

4.9.4.2 The location of the anchorage(s) shall be identified and the number of anchorages shall equal or exceed the number of permissible occupants. More than one occupant may attach to a single anchorage if the anchorage is rated and identified as being for more than one person.

4.9.4.3 Strength requirement. Anchorages shall be capable of withstanding a static force of 3,600 lbs. (16,000N) for each person allowed by the manufacturer on the attachment without reaching ultimate strength. The strength requirement shall apply only to the anchorage(s) and their attachments to the boom, platform or platform mounting.

Note: This does not imply that the aerial device is meant to meet or comply with this load requirement.

4.9.4.4 Connector requirement. Anchorage shall be compatible with a lanyard connector complying with ANSI/ASSE Z359.1-2007.

4.9.4.5 Surface. Anchorage(s) surfaces shall be free from sharp edges.

4.9.4.6 Pinch restriction. A lanyard connector shall not pinch between components having relative movement with the anchorage(s).

Note: See Sections 8.12.1, 9.3.1, 10.12.1 and 11.4.1 for more information pertaining to proper use of personal fall protection equipment.

The revision of the standard also made changes in the electrical sections. It clarifies the categories of insulated units with special attention given to the type of protection offered to the worker by the unit versus personal protective equipment.

5.1 Electrical Specifications – An aerial device with an insulated upper boom is commonly used to provide an additional layer of secondary protection from a path to ground through the boom and vehicle. This secondary protection is valuable; however, it cannot replace the worker’s primary protective equipment.

ANSI A92.2 CATEGORIES
Category A – Aerial devices which are designed and manufactured for work in which the boom is considered primary insulation (bare-hand work) shall have all conductive components at the platform end bonded together to accomplish equipotential of all such components. These aerial devices shall be equipped with a lower test electrode system. When these aerial devices are qualified for work above 138 kV, they shall be equipped with a gradient control device and conductive shield(s) over the lower test electrode system. For those aerial devices with ratings 138 kV and below, conductive shield(s) over the lower test electrode system are required. The necessity of a gradient control device is to be determined by the Qualification test.

Category B – Aerial devices which are equipped with a lower test electrode system, but are designed and manufactured for work in which the boom is not considered as primary insulation, but secondary, such as that using insulating (rubber) gloves. Category B aerial devices can be rated higher than 46 kV in order to facilitate changing them to Category A aerial devices for “bare-hand work.”

The manufacturer is reminded to consider in the design that “bare-hand work” requires the use of Category A aerial devices. Using Category B aerial devices on voltage levels above 46 kV requires the use of live line tools with appropriate dielectric ratings. These tools are to be depended upon for primary protection, just as in all cases where the boom is used as secondary protection (Categories B and C).

Category C – Aerial devices which are not equipped with a lower test electrode system and are designed and manufactured for work in which the boom is not considered as primary insulation, but secondary, such as that using insulating (rubber) gloves. These aerial devices are designed for voltages of 46 kV and below.

5.2.1 Insulating Systems – The insulating portions of the aerial device shall be identified in the manual and on the aerial device. All components crossing the insulating portions of the aerial device shall have electrical insulating values consistent with the design voltage rating of the boom, and when provided, of the chassis insulating system. The insulating system shall maintain the electrical insulating values in all working boom positions as defined by the manufacturer.

The above information is important to understand in light of the presence of metal components above the unit’s insulating sections.

CONDUCTIVE BOOM TIP
Contact of any component at the boom-tip with an energized conductor can energize all components at the boom-tip, including the control handle.

This concept is important when maintaining minimum approach distances to boom tip components.

1910.269 (l)(2) Minimum Approach Distances – The employer shall ensure that no employee approaches or takes any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than set forth in Table R-6 through Table R-10, unless:

(i) The employee is insulated from the energized part (insulating gloves or insulating gloves and sleeves worn in accordance with paragraph (l)(3) of this section are considered insulation of the employee only with regard to the energized part upon which work is being performed).

(ii) The energized part is insulated from the employee and from any other conductive object at a different potential.

(iii) The employee is insulated from any other exposed conductive object, as during live-line bare-hand work.

Note: Paragraphs (u)(5)(i) and (v)(5)(i) of this section contain requirements for the guarding and isolation of live parts. Parts of electric circuits that meet these two provisions are not considered as “exposed” unless a guard is removed or an employee enters the space intended to provide isolation from the live parts.

The revision of A92.2 for 2009 addresses this issue with allowances for control systems that incorporate High Electrical Resistance Components.

5.2.6 Upper Controls – The upper control conductive components are bonded together on Category A machines, but such bonding is optional on Category B and Category C machines. Categories B and C machines may incorporate control systems with high electrical resistance components. Machines that incorporate components for their electrical resistance shall receive an initial confirmation test and be subjected to the requirements for periodic inspections (See Sections 5.4.2.6, 5.4.3.6).

Controls that employ high electrical resistance components do not have a voltage rating and are not part of the insulating system that enables an aerial device to have an insulating rating. Whatever upper control arrangement is provided shall be identified. Specific warnings and advice shall be provided to the operator(s) that the upper controls do not provide protection in the event of electrical contact and are not a substitute for Minimum Approach Distances, cover-ups, rubber gloves and other personal protective equipment.

5.4.2.6 Confirmation test of upper control components with high electrical resistance. Upper controls that incorporate components for their electrical resistance shall be tested to assure resistance by testing them at 40 kV 60 Hz r.m.s. for 3 minutes with a maximum current level of 400 microamperes.

5.4.3.6 (Periodic) Confirmation Test of Upper Control Components with High Electrical Resistance. Upper controls that incorporate components for their electrical resistance should be tested to assure resistance by testing them at either 40 kV AC or 56 kV DC for 3 minutes with a maximum current level of 400 microamperes for the AC test and 56 microamperes for the DC test.

Covers and High Electrical Resistance upper controls offer new layers of protection for users of insulated aerial devices. This protection is valuable; however, it cannot replace the worker’s primary protective equipment.

Also dealing with this issue were changes to the requirements for manuals:

6.4 Manuals – The manufacturer shall provide a separate operators manual and a separate parts/ maintenance manual for each aerial device. Two sets of manuals shall accompany each device. The manuals shall contain:

(8) Facsimiles of all safety and operating decals and their location.

6.5.4 Instructional Markings. Markings shall be determined by the manufacturer or the manufacturer and user jointly to indicate hazards inherent in the operation of an aerial device. Instructional markings shall be provided for:

(9) Notice that fiberglass or plastic covers are not insulating.

(10) Notice that the aerial device shall not be operated with missing covers or guards, except as required for maintenance to the aerial device.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEALERS AND INSTALLERS
7.8 Training: The dealer or installer shall offer training or training materials that aid owners, users, operators, lessors and lessees in the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the aerial device. This training shall be offered initially and subsequently on request.

7.9 Maintenance Training: Dealer maintenance personnel shall be trained in inspection, testing and maintenance of the aerial device in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.

7.8.1 Dealer or Installer as User: Whenever a dealer or installer directs personnel to operate an aerial device (inspecting, sales demonstrations or any form of use), the dealer or installer shall assume the responsibilities of users as specified in Section 9 of this standard. All personnel authorized to operate the aerial device shall have been trained in a program that meets the requirements of this standard.

Section 8 Responsibilities of Owners was reorganized and new items were added in the inspection and test requirements:

8.2.3 Frequent Inspection and Test – The following inspections and tests shall be performed by the operator immediately prior to first use at the beginning of each shift:
1. Conduct walk-around visual inspection looking for damaged components, cracks or corrosion, excessive wear and any loose, deformed or missing bolts, pins, fasteners, locking devices and covers.
2. Check all controls and associated mechanisms for proper operation to include, but not limited to, the following:
a. Proper operation of interlocks.
b. Controls return to neutral when released and not sticking.
c. Control functions and operation clearly marked.
3. Check visual and audible safety devices for proper operation.
4. Visually inspect fiberglass and insulating components for visible damage and contamination.
5. Check for missing or illegible operational and instructional markings.
6. Check hydraulic and pneumatic systems for observable deterioration and excessive leakage.
7. Check electrical systems related to the aerial device for malfunction, signs of excessive deterioration, dirt and moisture accumulation.
8. Perform functional test to include, but not limited to, the following:
a. Set up aerial device for operation, including outriggers.
b. Cycle each aerial device boom function through its complete range of motion from the lower controls, except where operation through the complete range of motion would create a hazard.
c. Check functionality of emergency controls.

Any suspected items shall be carefully examined or tested and a determination made by a qualified person as to whether they constitute a safety hazard. All unsafe items shall be replaced or repaired before use.

8.2.4 Periodic Inspection or Test
(13) Condition and tightness of bolts and other fasteners in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendation.
(17) If the aerial device has upper controls equipped with high electrical resistance components and the manufacturer so indicates, they should be electrically tested per 5.4.3.6.

Any suspected items shall be carefully examined or tested and a determination made by a qualified person as to whether they constitute a safety hazard. All unsafe items shall be replaced or repaired before use.

8.2.5 Post Event Inspection or Test – After any reported event during which structural members of an aerial device or mobile unit are suspected of being subjected to loading or stresses in excess of design stress, such as after an accident involving overturning of the mobile unit or application of unintended external mechanical or electrical forces to the aerial device, the aerial device shall be removed from service and subjected to the applicable periodic inspection requirements in 8.2.4. In addition to the periodic inspection, supplemental non-destructive examination procedures or other tests to assist in detecting possible structural damage to the aerial device may be required. All damaged items shall be replaced or repaired before the unit is returned to service.

Also in Section 8 are some requirements for proper welding, use of aerial devices for intended applications, ownership notification and a prohibition on certain alterations.

8.4.2 Welding – Welding repairs of components or welds, designated as critical in the manufacturer’s manual shall be made in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and shall meet the Structural Welding Code AWS D1.1-2006 and AWS D1.2-2003. Should the original manufacturer no longer exist, an equivalent entity may determine the required procedure.

8.5.1 Alterations – Altering or disabling the function of safety devices, guards or interlocks, if so equipped, shall be prohibited.

8.7 Transfer of Ownership – When a change in ownership of an aerial device occurs, it shall be the responsibility of the seller to provide the manufacturer’s manual(s) for that aerial device to the purchaser. It is the responsibility of the purchaser to notify the manufacturer of the unit model and serial number and the name and address of the new owner within 60 days. If the owner uses other entities as agents, e.g., brokers, for the sale or the arrangement of a sale of an aerial device(s) his responsibilities under this section continue.

9.4 Application – The employer and authorized operator(s) shall ensure that the aerial device is used only for intended applications as defined in the operating manual and that all recognized safety practices are observed.

Note: The user is directed to Appendix C for guidance as to appropriate applications.

9.5 Electrical Hazard – All applicable safety-related work practices intended to protect from electrical hazards shall be defined and explained to the operator by a qualified person. The operator shall maintain the appropriate Minimum Approach Distance (MAD) from energized conductors and apparatus, commensurate with the operator’s qualifications. See Appendix F for the information on the Minimum Approach Distances and other precautions.

The operators section was also reorganized to match the inspection requirements in Section 8.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF OPERATORS
10.7 Alterations – Altering or disabling the function of safety devices, guards or interlocks, if so equipped, is prohibited.

10.8 Observations – Observations during operation for any defects shall be conducted on an ongoing basis.

10.8.1 Pre-start Inspection
1. Conduct walk-around visual inspection, looking for damaged components, cracks or corrosion, excessive wear and any loose, deformed or missing bolts, pins, fasteners, locking devices or covers.
2. Check all controls and associated mechanisms for proper operation to include, but not limited to, the following:
a. Proper operation of interlocks.
b. Controls return to neutral when released and not sticking.
c. Control functions and operation clearly marked.
3. Check visual and audible safety devices for proper operation.
4. Visually inspect fiberglass and insulating components for visible damage and contamination.
5. Check for missing or illegible operational and instructional markings.
6. Check hydraulic and pneumatic systems for observable deterioration and excessive leakage.
7. Check electrical systems related to the aerial device for malfunction, signs of excessive deterioration dirt and moisture accumulation.
8. Perform functional test to include, but not limited, to the following:
a. Set up aerial device for operation, including outriggers.
b. Cycle each aerial device boom function through its complete range of motion from the lower controls, except where operation through the complete range of motion would create a hazard.
c. Check functionality of emergency controls.

Any suspected items shall be carefully examined or tested and a determination made by a qualified person as to whether they constitute a safety hazard. All unsafe items shall be replaced or repaired before use.

10.9 Worksite – Before the aerial device is used, the worksite shall be surveyed for hazards such as:
1. Insufficient supporting surfaces such as soft ground or tamped earth fills.
2. Ditches.
3. Excessive slopes, drop-offs, curbs and floor obstructions.
4. Debris.
5. Overhead obstructions and electrical conductors.
6. Weather conditions.
7. Presence of unauthorized persons.
8. Road or worksite traffic.
9. Subsurface chambers such as underground utility components or septic systems.

The standard includes a new appendix, which discusses concepts important for work around energized conductors.

HANDLING ENERGIZED APPARATUS (APPENDIX F)
When the boom tip jib and/or winch of a category B or C aerial device is used for handling energized conductors and apparatus, the energized conductors and apparatus shall be insulated from the boom tip with electrical protection devices that are rated, tested and maintained for the appropriate rated line voltage.

Boom tip jibs used in material handling on aerial devices shall be considered non-insulating unless the jib has been rated, tested and maintained for the appropriate line voltage.

Safety rules and work practices may vary significantly for different users, but one universal rule that applies is when jibs are used as a live-line tool with category B and C aerial devices, platform occupant(s) must use protective equipment such as gloves and cover-ups.

If the winch line is used to lift energized apparatus, the energized apparatus shall be insulated from the jib tip with electrical protection devices that are rated, tested and maintained for the appropriate line voltage.

The winch line shall not be considered as insulating. For multi-phase lifting with conductor holders and a cross-arm, phase to phase protection shall be accomplished with a cross-arm that is rated, tested and maintained for the appropriate line voltage.

Insulating Liners and Insulating Baskets – A dielectrically tested insulating liner or insulating basket is intended to prevent electrical current flow through the lower extremities of the basket occupant. This is one element in a system approach that includes both work practices and materials designed to avoid electrical contact. Such a liner or basket shall not be considered primary insulation.

Minimum approach distances must be maintained by the electrical worker to assure clearances between objects at different electrical potential when performing live-line work. It applies to the worker’s reach including any non-insulating object above the insulated section of the aerial device. The Minimum Approach Distances may be obtained from sources such as, but not limited to:
ANSI C-2 National Electrical Safety Code
ANSI C-1 National Electrical Code
CFR 29 1926.950
CFR 29 1910.269
Work practices
(j) Live-line tools.
(1) Design of tools. Live-line tool rods, tubes and poles shall be designed and constructed to withstand the following minimum tests: (i) 100,000 volts per foot (3281 volts per centimeter) of length for 5 minutes if the tool is made of fiberglass-reinforced plastic (FRP).
(2) Condition of tools.
(i) Each live-line tool shall be wiped clean and visually inspected for defects before use each day.
(ii) If any defect or contamination that could adversely affect the insulating qualities or mechanical integrity of the live-line tool is present after wiping, the tool shall be removed from service and examined and tested according to paragraph (j)(2)(iii) of this section before being returned to service.
(iii) Live-line tools used for primary employee protection shall be removed from service every two years and whenever required under paragraph (j)(2)(ii) of this section for examination, cleaning, repair and testing.

Editor’s Note: The annual Electric Utility Fleet Managers Conference (EUFMC) hosts representatives of more than 50 companies in the U.S. and Canada, including investor-owned electric utilities, electric cooperatives and electrical contractors, and more than 270 representatives from more than 95 manufacturers and service providers. The conference includes an Equipment Demonstration and Display, which in 2010 was the site of more than 60 exhibits. EUFMC will be held June 19-22, 2011 at the Williamsburg Lodge and Conference Center in Williamsburg, Va. For more information, visit www.eufmc.com.

IP ARTICLE VAULT 2004 - 2015

Human Performance Tools: Important or Critical?

2014 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Arc Flash and the Benefits of Wearing PPE

Closing the Safety Gap

Chainsaw Safety, Planning and Precision Felling Techniques

Train the Trainer 101: Substation Entry Policies

Voice of Experience: How Does the Employer Ensure and Demonstrate?

December 2014 Q&A

December 2014 Management Toolbox

Lessons Learned, Successful Implementation of Behavioral Safety Coaching

The Pain Game: Preventing MSDs

Eliminating Excuses

Training for the New Century

Fall Protection by the Numbers

Injury Free Change

What It Takes to be a Safety and Compliance Leader

Why Single-Point Grounding Works

The Burning Question

Notes From the Underground

Leadership Influencing the Culture

Ergonomics: Preventing Injury

Taking Safety to the Next Level

4 Rules to Live By

Frostbite

A Friend in Need at Indiana Rural Electric Coops

Cleaning Rubber Goods for Safety

Lowering the Threshold

CAVE-IN! Increasing Job Site Safety & Reducing Costs

Keeping the ‘Fighter Pilots’ of Your Company Safe

Safety Comes First at SM Electric

Dramatic Results

Focusing on Safety at Comcast

When is a Lineman a Lineman?

Making Sure Everyone Goes Home Safe at Southern California Edison

Stay Alert! Work Safe!

Everyone Benefits at Charter Communications

Dissecting an OSHA Inspection

Top Five PPE Mistakes

Ultimate Protection

Learning Curve

Total Success at Dominion

NESC-2007 Update

Making Safe Choices

Tips for Improving Incident Investigation Interviews – Part 1: Preparation

The Key to Safety at KCP&L

Digging Out – The Interagency Snow Rescue Task Force

LockOut TagOut

Tips for Improving Incident Investigation Interviews- Part 2: Contact Time

Dreams Can Become Reality: SDG&E Flex Center

Bridging Communication Gaps

Equipotential Grounding at AEP

Training Development

Focusing on a Safety Culture at Consumers Energy

Substations: Eliminating the Dangers Within

Ensuring Safety at Grand Bahama Power

Perfect Storm – The Case for AED’s

Embracing Change: Think Human Performance

NESC 2007 FLAME RESISTANT CLOTHING

Managing Safety Rule Violations

Passion for Safety

How to Bulletproof Your Training

Tower Rescue Pre-planning Pays Off

Managing Safety

Effective Fall Protection for Utility Workers

Safety Information Superhighway

Inspection of Wooden Poles

Free Climbing vs. Safer Climbing

Safety Culture Success

Inspecting, Cleaning and Storing Live-Line Tools

Arc Flash – Are You in Compliance?

Human Performance

Training Second Point of Contact

Preventing Underground Damage

Keeping Things Safe in the Field and the Office

Winter Safety Vehicle Checklist

Strategies for Safety in the Wind Industry

What’s in a Number?

How to Choose and Use Ergonomic Hand Tools

Meeting the Challenge

Machine Safety

What You Need to Know About Substations

Moving from Operations into Safety or Training

Distribution Dispatcher or System Operator?

High Visibility and Arc Ratings for Flame Resistance

Stuck in the Mud

Aerial Rescue

Going With the Wind

Incident Analysis

Hidden Traps of Generator Use and Backfeed

Making the Right Choice

Soil Resistivity Testing & Grounding System Design: Part I of II

Succession Syndrome

Making Safety a Core Value

Floodwater Hazards and Precautions

Know the Signs and Symptoms of Heat-Related Illnesses

Huge Steps

Seamless and Compliant

Soil Resistivity Testing & Grounding System Design: Part II of II

Aerial Lifts

How Good Are Your Tailgates?

Root Cause Analysis

Maturity Matters

What Do We Do About Arc Hazard?

NESC-2012-Part 4: Summary of Change Proposals

A FULL Commitment

Arc Suppression Blanket Installation

What Does NFPA 70E Mean To You?

How Safe Are Your Ground Grids?

Introducing a New Certification Program for Utility Safety Professionals

Confused About Arc Flash Compliance?

Analyzing Safety and Hazards on the Job

Error-Free Performance

People Focused Safety

No Substitute

Error-Free Performance: Part II

Heard It Through the Grapevine

Best Practices

Line of Fire

Is Your Company Ready for the Next Disaster?

Preventing Employee Exposure to Pesticides

Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety

LOTO vs. Switching and Tagging

Are You on Cruise Control?

Solid Footing

Hand Protection

Crane & Derrick Compliance

Mind Control: Distractions, Stress and Your Ability to Work Safely

Rubber Insulating Line Hose

Procedure for Reducing Injuries

Huskie Tools Opens New Fiberglass Restoration Division

A92.2: The 2009 Standard

Vehicle Operation Winter Readiness

ATV Safety Begins with Proper Training

Innovate or Follow: The Argument Against A Best Practice

Northeast Utilities Takes Safety Off-Road

High-Pressure Hydraulic Injection Injuries

100 Percent Fall Protection: A Joint Union-Management Effort

Crew Foreman Needed: Who Do We Pick?

Behavior Safety: A Safety Program’s Missing Link

Challenges & Successes

Drop Zone Management: Expanding Our View of Line of Fire

Taking Stock of Your Fall Protection Compliance

Live-Line Tool Use and Care

Employee Training: How Hard Can It Be?

Supervisory Skills for Crew Leaders

Equipment: Back to Basics

A Second Look at Safety Glasses

Competition for a Cause

Human Behavior and Communication Skills for Crew Leaders

Cultivating a Mature Workforce

What’s Your Seat Belt IQ?

Substation Safety

No-Voltage Testing

Five PPE Safety Challenges

Safety Circuitry: The Power in the Brain

Arc Flash Exposure Revisited: NESC 2012 Part 4 Update

T&D Best Practices for Crew Leaders

CUSP Basics: Introduction to Human Performance Principles

Felling of Trees Near Power Lines

Working in Winter

Back to the Basics: PPE 101

Hearing Conservation: An Interesting Challenge

T&D Safety Management for Crew Leaders

Basic Qualifications of Employees

FR Layering Techniques

Safety Rules and Work Practices: Why Don’t They Match Up?

Effective Customer Relationships for Crew Leaders

The Value of Safety Certification

Safety Leadership in a Written Pre-Job Briefing

Communication: The Key to Great Safety

Safe Use of Portable Electric Tools, Cords and Generators

Keys to Effective Fall Protection

Integrity and Respect: Two of Our Most Important Tools

The Intersect: A Practical Guide to Work-Site Hazard Analysis

Strategic Safety Partners

Behavior Safety Training for Safety Committee Members

Combating Overuse and Overexertion Injuries

Safe Digging – Get the 411 on 811

Apprenticeship Training

How S.A.F.E.T.Y. Brought Bluebonnet Through the Fires

Formal vs. On-the-Job Training

That’s What I Meant to Say: Safety Leadership in Communication

The Value of Personal Protective Equipment

Safety and Human Performance: You Can’t Have One Without the Other

Oh, No! Changes in the Workplace

Performance Improvement: Barriers to Events

Train the Trainer 101: Ferroresonance Explained

Voice of Experience: Safety Excellence Equals Operational Excellence

A Mirror: Your Most Important PPE

Care of Portable Ladders

Voice of Experience: FMCSR Compliance: Driver Qualification Files

Train the Trainer 101: Enclosed Space Rescue

Keys to Evaluating and Comparing Arc-Rated and Flame-Resistant Fabrics

Raising the Bar, Lowering the EMR

How Six Sigma Can Improve Your Safety Performance

Detecting Shock Hazards at Transmission Line Work Sites

Care and Maintenance of Climbers

Voice of Experience: Are You Ready for the Big Storm?

Train the Trainer 101: Working from Crane-Mounted Baskets

Learning Leadership: The Leadership Paradigm Shift

Are You Prepared for the Next Generation of Lineworkers?

Implementing a Zero Injury Program

Public Safety and Our First Responders

Managing Cold Stress

Live-Line Work on the Jersey Shore

Soil Classification and Excavation Safety

Voice of Experience: The Definition of Personal Protective Equipment

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 1: Self-Awareness

Evaluating Crew Supervisors

Train the Trainer 101: Arc Hazard Protection

NESC and ANSI Z535 Safety Sign Standards for Electric Utility Power Plants and Substations

Working Safely with Chain Saws

The Globally Harmonized System for Classifying and Labeling Chemicals

Voice of Experience: The Cost of Business

Train the Trainer 101: Understanding Grounding for the Protection of All Employees

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 2: Self-Regulation

Occupational Dog Bite Prevention & Safety

Safety Awareness for Substations

Bighorn Sheep vs. Lineworkers: What’s the Difference?

OSHA Job Briefing Basics

Voice of Experience: Training for the Qualified Employee

Train the Trainer 101: ASTM F855 Grounding Equipment Specs Made Simple

Foundation Drilling Safety: The Aldridge Electric Story of Success

The Authority to Stop Work

Starting From the Ground Up

Understanding Step and Touch Potential

Multitasking vs. Switch-Tasking: What’s the Difference?

Voice of Experience: Incidents and the Failure to Control Work

Train the Trainer 101: Live-Line Tool Maintenance Program

Passing the CUSP Exam

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 4: Social Awareness

Ergonomics for Lineworkers

Are Your Temporary Protective Grounds Really Protecting You?

Voice of Experience: Working On or Near Exposed Energized Parts

Train the Trainer 101: Why You Need More than 1910 and 1926

Transitioning to FR Clothing

Leadership Skill Set 5: Social Persuasion

Safety Management During Change

Spice It Up!

The Singing Lineman

Emergency Action Plans for Remote Locations

Trenching and Excavations: Considerations for the Competent Person

Traffic Safety for Lineworkers

Using Best Practices to Drive Safety Culture

Voice of Experience: The Globally Harmonized System is Here

Train the Trainer 101: Grounding Trucks and Mobile Equipment

The Power of an Effective Field Observation Program

What OSHA’s Proposed Silica Rule Means to You

2013 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Learning Leadership: Personal Protective Emotional Armor: Part 1

Electrical Capacitors in AC Circuits

Improving Safety Through Communication

The Benefits of The CUSP Credential

Voice of Experience: Why Did I Do That?

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Elements for Developing a Safety Culture

Learning Leadership: Personal Protective Emotional Armor: Part 2

Fact-Finding Techniques for Incident Investigations

Electrical Safety for Utility Generation Operations Personnel: A Practical Approach

Addressing Comfort and Contamination in Arc-Rated Clothing

Are You Your Brother’s Keeper?

2013 iP Safety Awards

A Key to Safety Performance Improvement

Salt River Project: Devoted to Safety Excellence

Train the Trainer 101: Safety Incentive Programs

Voice of Experience: OSHA 300 Record-Keeping Rules

Understanding and Influencing the ‘Bulletproof’ Employee

Sustaining Safety Successes

Accident Analysis Using the Multi-Employer Citation Policy

PPE: Much More Than Basic or General Protection

Voice of Experience: Understanding Enclosed and Confined Spaces

Train the Trainer 101: OSHA Forklift Certification Requirements

June 2014 Q&A

Injury Prevention Through Leadership, Employee Engagement and Analytics

NFPA 70E Arc Flash Protection for Nonexempt Industry Workers

The Final Rule

Distributed Generation Safety for Lineworkers

The Perils of Distracted Driving

August 2014 Q&A

Voice of Experience: OSHA Eye and Face Protection Standards

Train the Trainer 101: Fall Protection and the New Rule

Responding to Pole Fires

SRP Rope Access Program Addresses Towers of Power

Elements of an Effective Safety Committee

Mitigating the Risks of Aerial Patrols

Job Briefing for One

Culture Eats Programs for Breakfast

October 2014 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Flame-Resistant Apparel is Now PPE

Train the Trainer 101: Stringing in Energized Environments

The Risks and Rules of Chainsaw Operation

Behavior-Based Safety: What’s the Verdict?

Photovoltaic Solar Safety Management for Utilities

Drones and the Future of Tower Safety

Storytelling as a Management Tool

Safety and Common Sense

Snubbing to Steel Lattice Structures: Lessons Learned

February 2015 Management Toolbox

February 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: The Importance of Job Briefings

Train the Trainer 101: Addressing Anchorages

Recent PPE Changes and 2015 Trends

Growing a Human Performance Culture

Measuring, Planning and Cutting Methods for Chainsaw Operators

The Importance of Matching Evidence Marks in Accident Investigations

Safe By a Nose

Overhead Utility Hazards: Look Up and Live

April 2015 Management Toolbox

April 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: OSHA Updates to Arc-Rated FR Clothing Requirements

Train the Trainer 101: The OSHA-EEI Subpart V Settlement

The Safety Side Effect: How Good Supervisors Coincidentally Improve Safety

Facing Unique Challenges

The Roller-Coaster Life Cycle of IEEE 1307

The Power of Human Intuition

Thirty Years of Personal Perspective

The Most Important Tool on the Job Site

June 2015 Management Toolbox

June 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Fundamentals of Underground Padmount Transformers

Train the Trainer 101: Back to Basics: ‘Gentlemen, This is a Football’

Arrive Alive

How to Navigate the FR Clothing Marketplace

Making the Switch

Understanding OSHA Electric Power Training Requirements

Distribution Switching Safety

Human Performance and a Rat Trap

August 2015 Management Toolbox

August 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Power Generation Safety and the OSHA Update

Stringing Best Practices: Mesh Grips vs. Preforms

Understanding Safety Culture Through Perception Surveys

RF Safety for Utility Workers

2015 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Underground Safety: Handling Neutrals and Rescue

Voice of Experience: PPE Regulatory and Consensus Standard Requirements

December 2015 Q&A

December 2015 Management Toolbox

The 911 Dilemma

Spotters: A Critical Element of Site Safety

Coping With Industry Changes

The Safety Coaching Observation Process

Fundamentals of Substation Rescue Plans

Recruiting and Training the Next Generation

Shifting Your Organizational Safety Culture

Investigating Industrial Hygiene at Salt River Project

Train the Trainer 101: Practical MAD and Arc Flash Protection

Voice of Experience: Clearing Up Confusion About 1910.269

October 2015 Q&A

October 2015 Management Toolbox

N95 Filtering Face Pieces: Where Does Your Organization Stand?

Stepping Up Steel Safety Education

Rigging Fundamentals for Utilities

Arc Flash Mitigating Technologies and the OSHA Final Rule

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Personal Protective Grounding

OSHA and the Host-Contractor Relationship