Open the trench, vault or manhole. Strip back the jacket. Expose the neutrals. Remove the semicon and insulation. Crimp the connector. Rebuild the conductor shield, insulation and semicon. Seal the outside. This splicing routine eventually becomes second nature for medium-voltage cable splicers, which can make some workdays feel like a rote checklist to slog through. But each procedural step exists to help ensure precision electrical devices are competently dismantled and rebuilt. Reliable execution is more likely when splicers understand the logic at the root of each step. This article explores that logic in greater detail. Examining the Layers A modern medium-voltage cable, whether insulated with cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or ethylene propylene rubber (EPR), is built in layers from the inside out. The conductor is at the center. A semiconductive strand shield (conductor shield) sits around it, covered by a thick layer of insulation. Atop that insulation is a second semiconductive layer (insulation shield), followed by a metallic shield or concentric neutral, and finally a protective jacket. During manufacturing, each cable layer is extruded and assembled in controlled factory conditions to create a smooth, predictable electric field from the conductor to ground. Cutting into the cable interrupts its field control system, designed by the manufacturer to last decades. Industry professionals use splice and termination kits to reconstruct these systems. Reconstruction work begins with the conductor, which could be copper or aluminum, concentric or compact stranded. Splicers must confirm correct installation of connectors. Ideally, conductor and connector metals will be the same; copper-aluminum connections risk corrosion. Note that an under-crimped connector or a connector with the wrong die marks is a built-in hot spot. Adequate crimping squeezes the metal to create a low-resistance, mechanically strong joint that will not loosen, shift or change shape under thermal cycling or fault current. Inadequate crimping means extra heat during normal operation that stresses insulation from the inside out. Smoothing the Electric Field Surrounding the conductor is the inner semiconductive layer, also called the conductor shield. Its job is to smooth the electric field at the conductor’s surface. A stranded conductor is full of sharp edges and tiny gaps. If we directly apply insulation over those strands, the electric field will concentrate at each strand tip and across each tiny air pocket. Those spots can ionize under medium-voltage stress, prompting partial discharge that erodes insulation. The conductor shield fills the voids, bonds to the insulation, and presents a smooth, nearly cylindrical surface at the same potential as the conductor. When stripping this layer during a splice, use specialized tools and correct depth settings to ensure a clean finish with no ridges or gouges. These are not cosmetic efforts; a single nick in the insulation or jagged edge left on the conductor shield is a future stress point that could lead to breakdown. The main insulation layer, either XLPE or EPR, blocks system voltage from ground. It is more than thick rubber or plastic, polarizing when voltage is applied. The electric field sets up radially from the conductor to the insulation shield. Stress is highest at the inner surface, near the conductor; it is lowest at the outer surface. Cable manufacturers spec materials and thicknesses to ensure maximum stress does not exceed insulation breakdown strength or the level at which partial discharges will begin. Stress is best handled by smooth, uniform insulation. Employers and trainers take note: Because weak points typically result from scratches, inadvertent cuts, contaminants and moisture on insulation surfaces, splicers must be qualified to use specialized tools, strip cable in a controlled fashion, and competently clean tools, cable and equipment. Weak points are the reason insulation levels exist. Clearly, the wall of a 15-kV cable with 133% insulation is thicker than one with 100% insulation. Thick insulation is intended for systems in which ground faults could take up to an hour to clear. Thinner, 100% insulation is not designed for those conditions (clears a fault in 60 seconds or less). Critically, as we choose cables and accessories, we also choose our dielectric margins should something go wrong. Uniform Ground Potential A cable’s outer semiconductive layer is functionally similar to the conductor shield, managing the electric field at the insulation’s outer surface. This layer bonds to the insulation, keeping its surface at a uniform ground potential. During normal operation, the electric field is almost entirely located between the conductor and this shield; little of it exists in the jacket or surrounding soil and air, which explains why a qualified person can safely touch a grounded shielded cable that contains thousands of volts. Splicers must cut back this outer semicon layer to the exact length specified by the splice or termination kit’s instructions. The cutback distance, the straightness and smoothness of its edge, and the exposed insulation’s cleanliness are nonnegotiable details, determining how electrical stress will behave once the splice or termination is energized. A crooked or ragged semicon edge elevates local stress. Dirt and moisture encourage tracking. When we take time to perfectly dress the edge, we are shaping the future electric field. Metallic Shield and Outer Jacket Functionality Depending on the cable, the metallic shield located outside the insulation shield could consist of helically wrapped concentric copper neutrals, flat copper straps, copper tape with overlap, or a corrugated metal sheath. This shield performs critical functions: providing a low-impedance path for fault current; allowing protective devices to clear faults quickly; carrying the small charging current that flows through the insulation during normal operation; and confining the electric field, limiting stress exposure. In many distribution designs, the metallic shield also serves as the return path for unbalanced load current. Any cuts to the cable also cut the metallic shield. If we do not restore continuity using properly sized and installed bonds, braids and spring clamps, we change how future faults will travel and where voltage will rise during abnormal conditions. Floating and poorly bonded shields are associated with dangerous potentials, delayed fault clearings and changes in electric field behavior near splices. Bonds are rebuilt by gathering every neutral wire and reattaching them according to the company’s approved reshielding process, restoring the safety system surrounding the insulation. A cable’s outer jacket prevents water penetration, defends neutrals against corrosion, and safeguards shields and insulation from physical damage. When we strip the jacket to make a splice, we create a potential path for water entry. Modern cable manufacturers use water-swellable tapes and powders to address this reality, but they also rely on good seals. Some splice and termination kits call for use of specific mastics and sealant wraps and instruct users to add rejacketing sleeves over their splices; these actions greatly assist in protecting a cable’s contents. Moisture, corrosion and thermal cycling undermine splices that are electrically perfect but poorly sealed, leading to their eventual failure. Geometric Stress Control The cable layers described above work together to control electrical stress. The stress present in an intact section of cable is purely radial and behaviorally predictable. Trouble begins with the introduction of a shield cutback, termination or other discontinuity point where the electric field must bend. In those cases, the field no longer runs straight out from the conductor, instead curling along the insulation’s surface and into the surrounding air, causing longitudinal stress and creating areas in which the field can potentially bunch up. If the outer shield ends abruptly, with bare insulation continuing, the electric field crowds around that sharp edge. Concentrated stress under operating voltage produces corona and tracking, especially in humid and contaminated conditions, eroding materials and potentially leading to a flashover or failure. Geometric stress control (i.e., the use of shape to spread out the electric field) solves the problem. The stress cones and internal contours of premolded and cold-shrink terminations and taped splices are designed to extend a conductive or semiconductive surface beyond the shield edge so that potential drops gradually over a longer path. Capacitive and resistive stress grading using tapes and mastics with special electrical properties takes this idea one step further. Applied in precise patterns at the shield cutback, the materials pull some of the electric field into themselves, distributing the voltage drop over their length. Pattern instructions that call for an exact number of half-lapped layers, starting precisely at the semicon edge and ending at a specified distance, are the result of laboratory design and testing. Conclusion A medium-voltage splice is a field-built extension of a cable’s original design. The conductor must be solid and correctly installed. Its surrounding conductor shield and insulation must be uniform and clean. The semiconductive layer must reestablish smooth electric field boundaries. The metallic shield must be continuous and grounded. The jacket must seal and prevent water and other physical damage. When medium-voltage splicers understand why each cable layer exists, a splice or termination kit’s instructions begin to look less like suggestions and more like what they truly are: a roadmap to restoring a cable’s safe, factory-quality performance. Well-made splices disappear into lines, quietly doing their work during storms and faults without drawing attention. Achieving that level of reliability is a direct result of qualified splicers who understand cable contents and construction, how electrical stress behaves inside cable, and the significance of each cut, crimp and wrap. About the Author: Mark Savage is the owner of DeadBreak, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business providing underground distribution and transmission training, consulting and field services. A U.S. Marine Corps veteran with over 25 years of experience in underground construction and emergency response, Savage is a credentialed journeyman cable splicer/lineman and qualified medium-voltage splicing trainer. Reach him at msavage@deadbreak.us.

Utilities are investing millions of dollars in drones, automated monitoring systems and artificial intelligence applications. These tools offer unprecedented safety and operational advantages as grid complexities evolve – assuming crews willingly use them as intended. New technology should make it safer and easier for frontline workers to execute their tasks, particularly when stressed or fatigued. Deploying drones to conduct post-storm inspections, for instance, keeps workers safely distanced from hazardous areas while potentially speeding up triage efforts. Digital pre-job briefing forms that incorporate AI-driven alerts offer crews enhanced, real-time understanding of worksite risks before they arrive. But successfully rolling out newly adopted safety technologies is no small feat. Frontline buy-in depends on an organization’s cultural readiness. How can readiness be achieved? A sustainable strategy begins with people. It is then enforced via process and enhanced by technology. In that order. Safety Lives in the Field Safety starts at the top, but it lives in the field. Frontline workers will notice if senior leaders only speak about safety during budget meetings. By incorporating it into daily tailboards, performance metrics, public commitments and organizational strategy, leaders demonstrate that safety is a nonnegotiable organizational value. Critically, leaders must be good listeners, consulting frontline workers for their firsthand insights into the organization’s operational risks and inefficiencies. Feedback loops assist decision-makers in determining the merits of new safety solutions. These loops are especially helpful when piloting AI-driven systems, whose accuracy is shaped through human oversight. Technology buy-in often expands as workers witness the impact of their feedback. For example, one utility that uses an AI tool to enhance infrastructure inspections noted a boost in tool adoption when crews began gathering for post-shift debriefings. The time crew members spent analyzing AI images of their jobsites, flagging errors and feeding that data into the model increased its future reliability and relevance. Change Management Workers will commonly shelve new technology tools that are poorly rolled out. Leaders have various options to mitigate this risk, including appointing organizational safety champions as liaisons between field crews and technology/innovation teams; hosting cross-functional workshops during which information technology, operations and safety personnel collaborate to address adoption barriers; and celebrating quick wins that underscore new technology’s advantages. Dominion Energy offers a good example. As part of a drone and AI implementation project, the utility designated safety liaisons to facilitate communication between leadership and field teams, which played a significant role in building early momentum for the broader rollout. Employee Training Technology can only be as effective as its users. Thus, employers must ensure their employees are trained to best leverage its value. Some utility organizations are using other technologies to assist with training, such as virtual- and augmented-reality applications that simulate real-world scenarios, reducing risk to trainees. Peer mentoring, which combines relational and procedural learning, often complements formal industry training. Pairing seasoned lineworkers with younger, less experienced employees can be mutually beneficial, enhancing technology skills transfer and reinforcing institutional and industry wisdom. Safety Accelerants With the right people and processes in place, utilities can use new technologies to accelerate safer field operations. Consider the following three examples. 1. Drones Drone adoption has become increasingly common within industry organizations. For instance, in 2023, New York Power Authority invested $37.2 million in its drone program. Integrated into these unmanned aerial systems are high-resolution cameras, light detection and ranging (lidar), and thermal sensors that enhance fault and damage detection capabilities while limiting worker hazard exposure and bucket truck deployments. Frontline buy-in becomes more likely when crews feel confident that the data collected by company drones will be accurate, easily accessible and fully integrated into their workflows. Some utilities have addressed this by implementing joint flight validation sessions during which pilots and field technicians collaborate to review drone inspection footage. These sessions can uncover technological and procedural blind spots and reinforce to personnel that drones are considered tools, not worker replacements. 2. Artificial and Visual Intelligence AI accelerates the identification of infrastructure corrosion, vegetation risks and structural faults at a scale that humans alone can’t match. Beyond speed and scale, human-in-the-loop AI models incorporate experienced inspectors to validate and refine model outputs, helping to reduce errors, build user trust and strengthen organizational learning. Field safety can be dramatically enhanced when AI learns from humans and humans trust its support. During Hurricane Harvey, for example, one utility used AI-powered drone data to safely route repair crews away from flooded roads and damaged assets, improving response times while minimizing crew hazard exposure. 3. Substation Monitoring Substations are sometimes inspected just once a year by a single technician. Today, AI-enabled monitoring systems offer 24/7 surveillance that alerts users to overheating, smoke, fire, unauthorized access incidents and PPE violations in real time. Some monitoring systems also act as a second set of eyes for lone workers, detecting falls and prolonged inactivity and triggering alerts. Moving the Needle As the U.S. electrical grid grows more complex, frontline employee safety and system resilience increasingly depend on the power and influence of strong, healthy organizational cultures. New technologies alone won’t improve safety or other outcomes. Utilities begin to move the needle when leadership sets clear intentions, builds and refines processes that reinforce cultural values, and rolls out new technologies with ample training and respect for workers. About the Author: Kaitlyn Albertoli is co-founder and CEO of Buzz Solutions (www.buzzsolutions.co), a California-based provider of visual intelligence solutions to inspect, maintain and secure energy infrastructure. Editor’s Note: Learn more from Kaitlyn in a recent podcast interview with iP’s Kate Wade, available at https://utilitysafety.podbean.com/e/utility-safety-podcast-using-visual-intelligence-to-strengthen-utility-infrastructure/.