Skip to main content

LOOKING FOR SOMETHING?

Why Single-Point Grounding Works

Written by Jim Vaughn, CUSP on . Posted in , .

The pros and cons of single-point equipotential grounding, as opposed to working between your grounds or bracket grounding, has generated a lot of discussion. As found in IEEE-1048 Guide for Protective Grounding of Power Lines, single-point equipotential grounding is becoming more simply and accurately referred to as worksite grounding.

In most cases, those who don’t trust worksite grounding don’t understand how or why it works. In fact, we have always been taught as linemen to “work between your grounds,” and that seemed like good advice. But it may not have been the best advice.*
This is an attempt to explain why worksite grounding does work, and why it is considered by, and recommended by, many authorities including OSHA and ANSI, as the best method to provide you as a lineman with the best chance of survival in case of the worst.

THREE IMPORTANT FUNDAMENTALS
In order to accept the theoretical logic of why equipotential worksite grounding works, you need to remember three basic fundamentals from basic electricity.
First fundamental: Most not all electricity (voltage and current) always flows through the path of least resistance.
Second fundamental: Electricity will only flow where there is a path and that path always returns to the source.
Third fundamental: When there is a parallel path, there is always flow through both paths and the greater flow will be in the path of least resistance.
You also need to understand that the human body can, and often does, withstand small or unobjectionable current flows across the body and that the body has significant resistance (reported to be about 1000 ohms) that can resist current flow.

UNDERSTANDING INDUCED CURRENTS
While grounding protects against unintentional energizing of cleared circuits, there should be just as much concern placed on induced voltage (capacitive) or current (inductive) on de-energized lines. Induced voltages are caused by energized parallel circuits or where energized circuits cross other circuits. The hazard of induced voltage is even more important with today’s higher distribution voltages and the addition of more transmission circuits to serve expanding loads. Induced current is also known as magnetic induction. Magnetic induction is different than induced voltage in several ways.
• Induced voltage is dependant on the distance of air space between the source circuit and the line on which induced voltage is present, just like induced current.
• Induced voltage, however, is not dependant on the parallel length of the two circuits where induced current is very dependant on the length of the parallel lines.
• Induced voltage is dependant on the level of the voltage in the source circuit (which remains fairly constant over the work day). Induced current, on the other hand, is dependant on the level of the source current and is more likely to become present or to rise as current rises in the source circuit.
• Induced voltage can be harmlessly and easily drained from the circuit with a single ground creating a slight but unobjectionable current. Induced current, on the other hand, will flow to ground in a single ground, but will remain at the highest current level the conditions for magnetic induction will allow.

CIRCULATING INDUCED CURRENT
This brings us to the problem of circulating current that can occur in a two-point bracket grounding arrangement. Keep in mind that unexpected fault current will behave the same as induced current as described below in a two-point ground arrangement.
Induced current will flow in a conductor in the opposite direction of the source circuit if a flow path in the induced line is provided. If one low impedance ground is installed between phase and neutral, a large portion of the full value of induced current will begin to flow into the system neutral or earth. If a second ground is installed phase to neutral on the other side of the work area, a current loop is created. A portion of the full value of the induced current will flow in a circular path down the first ground, across the neutral to the second ground, up the second ground back onto the phase and back again to the first ground in a current loop.
The only way to limit the circulation is to shunt the loop at the center. The shunt, a third ground, will split the current. Part of the current on the neutral will rise on the shunt to the phase. Another part of the current will move from the phase down to the neutral in the opposite direction. This shunt, with current trying to flow in two directions, will tend to cancel one another out, creating two smaller cells of circulation instead of one more powerful one. Without the third shunt ground in place, if an induced current or fault current should arise, a condition could occur where a lineman placed between the phase and pole or ground becomes the shunt. The body, in this case, is not in parallel with either of the outside grounds, but is now in series with two opposing currents. The resistance of the body is not enough to prevent a serious, if not deadly, current contact. Understanding this potential for circulating induced current, it is now time to discuss the equipotential worksite method.

WORKSITE GROUNDING CONNECTIONS
With magnetic or electrical induction, a worksite ground still has current flow, but all of the conductive components bonded together are at the same potential, minimizing the risk of injury. The first connection is to install a grounding bail or grounding cluster bar securely and directly to the pole below the system neutral. The bail provides a common connection point for all the ground connections and makes an electrical bonding connection between the wood pole and grounds. The next connection is from the bail to the system neutral. Use conductor lengths as short as is possible when making connections in the grounding scheme. The third connection is from the bail to the phase and, of course, phase to phases.
As usual it is imperative for the integrity of this protection scheme that all connections be virtually resistance free. This means approved grounding clamps, sufficient conductor size** (no less than #2 copper) and properly wire brushed conductor surfaces, as well as wire brushed ground clamp surfaces.
In this arrangement, an unplanned current, whether from fault or induction, will be passed to ground around the protected area between the limits of the phase and ground connections. A lineman on the pole, feet planted above the bail with hands on the phase, will be in parallel with the protection scheme. But, since induced voltages or currents constantly flow through the common connected scheme, there is no “potential” difference to create a hazard. If there is a sudden rise in voltage because of an unplanned energizing of the circuit, the voltage rises on all connected parts of the zone protecting the worker. A hazard still exists for workers on the ground. Around the pole or equipment connected to ground, there will still be high potential differences between each piece of grounded equipment AND the equipment and earth. There will also still be ground surface voltage gradients radiating out from the earth connections. Persons at ground level are not protected by worksite or bracket grounding and must take appropriate measures for personal protection from those hazards. (See image for further information on this topic.)

TOUCH POTENTIAL ABOVE THE NEUTRAL
A frequently asked question concerning worksite grounding is about touch potential on the wood pole between the lineman’s feet and hands if he is touching the pole during a fault. For touch potential to exist there must be current flow and resistance across the touch surface to produce a difference in potential. From neutral to pole top, all of the components including the wood pole are bonded together so the voltage on all surfaces rises at the exact same instant. As a result, there is no voltage gradient to create a touch potential hazard.

BONDING WOOD POLES
OSHA requires that for the purpose of fault and protective ground calculations, a wood pole must be considered a conductor because the resistance of the pole changes from day to day depending on atmospheric conditions. Poles used to be routinely bonded from neutral to pole top pin. That is not always the case today for high BIL purposes. Pole top bonding helps to reduce the resistance of the pole, making it more conductive. Bonding of a wood pole to bring it to equal potential with all other conductive surfaces is one of the keys to effective worksite grounding. The pole bond plays an important role in the scheme and, if installed, should not be removed.

THE LAST CONSIDERATION
Any protective grounding arrangement jeopardizes the safety of persons on the ground. Grounding, whether bracket or worksite, is placed to protect the employee aloft. All of the above mentioned configurations expose the employee on the ground, particularly when the truck is bonded to the system neutral. The system neutral in a wye system is a current-carrying conductor. The voltage on the neutral is limited by the grounding of the conductor. Normally, the neutral carries the expected system current with only insignificant amounts of current flowing down the higher resistance pole grounds. A truck connected to a system neutral, with or without the outriggers in contact with the earth, is a high resistance path to ground from the system neutral in parallel with the pole bond. It is estimated that 79% of all phase faults are phase-to-ground or neutral faults and the average fault current is in the neighborhood of 1500 amps lasting between 2 cycles and 2 seconds (Hard To Find Information About Distribution Systems, Synergetic Design Engineering Consultants, 2003). That amperage would overload the current carrying capacity of a neutral and fault current would flow through the grounds or any conductive equipment connected in parallel with the neutral and ground—like a truck.
If a remote fault impresses current on a truck connected to the neutral, any person touching that equipment is exposed to contact. In addition, since that current is impressed into the earth through the ground rods or the truck, the ground in the vicinity of the rods or truck will be electrified. Because the earth has varying degrees of conductivity, even over the course of a couple of feet, there exist differences in potential that can cause the electrocution of an individual who has been exposed to the earth gradient (difference) between his feet—known as step potential. Any contact between an employee standing on the ground and touching a piece of equipment grounded to the system is subject to injury by touch potential. The only way to ensure against these conditions on the ground is for all grounded equipment to be surrounded by equipotential mats (required by OSHA 1910.269 (p)(4)(iii)[C][4]) where access to and egress from the mat is done by hopping, as opposed to stepping, so that the feet are never touching the mat and the earth at the same time, or by all ground personnel wearing dielectric overshoes.

A FINAL POINT
The fundamental that makes any protective grounding work against unplanned energizing of the line is the potential difference in the connected components. It is imperative that the grounding connections be clean and resistance free. Always remember this: The more resistance you build into your protective ground, the more current there will be across your body in case of a fault. Ground it, but ground it right and ground it well! ip

*This presentation attempts to explain in a clear fashion the best information available about the practice of protective grounding for personal protection.  It is necessary that the reader understand that while the author believes the information represented is accurate and reliable, the author and Incident Prevention Magazine makes no claims as to the appropriateness of any particular method of grounding for personal protection.  The Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires the worker’s employer to define and administer the appropriate practices for their employee’s protection according to the conditions that exist on the respective electrical system.

**The utility is responsible for assessing the maximum current that may be encountered in any condition and specifying the appropriate ground conductor size.

video

IP ARTICLE VAULT 2004 - 2015

Human Performance Tools: Important or Critical?

2014 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Arc Flash and the Benefits of Wearing PPE

Closing the Safety Gap

Chainsaw Safety, Planning and Precision Felling Techniques

Train the Trainer 101: Substation Entry Policies

Voice of Experience: How Does the Employer Ensure and Demonstrate?

December 2014 Q&A

December 2014 Management Toolbox

Lessons Learned, Successful Implementation of Behavioral Safety Coaching

The Pain Game: Preventing MSDs

Eliminating Excuses

Training for the New Century

Fall Protection by the Numbers

Injury Free Change

What It Takes to be a Safety and Compliance Leader

Why Single-Point Grounding Works

The Burning Question

Notes From the Underground

Leadership Influencing the Culture

Ergonomics: Preventing Injury

Taking Safety to the Next Level

4 Rules to Live By

Frostbite

A Friend in Need at Indiana Rural Electric Coops

Cleaning Rubber Goods for Safety

Lowering the Threshold

CAVE-IN! Increasing Job Site Safety & Reducing Costs

Keeping the ‘Fighter Pilots’ of Your Company Safe

Safety Comes First at SM Electric

Dramatic Results

Focusing on Safety at Comcast

When is a Lineman a Lineman?

Making Sure Everyone Goes Home Safe at Southern California Edison

Stay Alert! Work Safe!

Everyone Benefits at Charter Communications

Dissecting an OSHA Inspection

Top Five PPE Mistakes

Ultimate Protection

Learning Curve

Total Success at Dominion

NESC-2007 Update

Making Safe Choices

Tips for Improving Incident Investigation Interviews – Part 1: Preparation

The Key to Safety at KCP&L

Digging Out – The Interagency Snow Rescue Task Force

LockOut TagOut

Tips for Improving Incident Investigation Interviews- Part 2: Contact Time

Dreams Can Become Reality: SDG&E Flex Center

Bridging Communication Gaps

Equipotential Grounding at AEP

Training Development

Focusing on a Safety Culture at Consumers Energy

Substations: Eliminating the Dangers Within

Ensuring Safety at Grand Bahama Power

Perfect Storm – The Case for AED’s

Embracing Change: Think Human Performance

NESC 2007 FLAME RESISTANT CLOTHING

Managing Safety Rule Violations

Passion for Safety

How to Bulletproof Your Training

Tower Rescue Pre-planning Pays Off

Managing Safety

Effective Fall Protection for Utility Workers

Safety Information Superhighway

Inspection of Wooden Poles

Free Climbing vs. Safer Climbing

Safety Culture Success

Inspecting, Cleaning and Storing Live-Line Tools

Arc Flash – Are You in Compliance?

Human Performance

Training Second Point of Contact

Preventing Underground Damage

Keeping Things Safe in the Field and the Office

Winter Safety Vehicle Checklist

Strategies for Safety in the Wind Industry

What’s in a Number?

How to Choose and Use Ergonomic Hand Tools

Meeting the Challenge

Machine Safety

What You Need to Know About Substations

Moving from Operations into Safety or Training

Distribution Dispatcher or System Operator?

High Visibility and Arc Ratings for Flame Resistance

Stuck in the Mud

Aerial Rescue

Going With the Wind

Incident Analysis

Hidden Traps of Generator Use and Backfeed

Making the Right Choice

Soil Resistivity Testing & Grounding System Design: Part I of II

Succession Syndrome

Making Safety a Core Value

Floodwater Hazards and Precautions

Know the Signs and Symptoms of Heat-Related Illnesses

Huge Steps

Seamless and Compliant

Soil Resistivity Testing & Grounding System Design: Part II of II

Aerial Lifts

How Good Are Your Tailgates?

Root Cause Analysis

Maturity Matters

What Do We Do About Arc Hazard?

NESC-2012-Part 4: Summary of Change Proposals

A FULL Commitment

Arc Suppression Blanket Installation

What Does NFPA 70E Mean To You?

How Safe Are Your Ground Grids?

Introducing a New Certification Program for Utility Safety Professionals

Confused About Arc Flash Compliance?

Analyzing Safety and Hazards on the Job

Error-Free Performance

People Focused Safety

No Substitute

Error-Free Performance: Part II

Heard It Through the Grapevine

Best Practices

Line of Fire

Is Your Company Ready for the Next Disaster?

Preventing Employee Exposure to Pesticides

Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety

LOTO vs. Switching and Tagging

Are You on Cruise Control?

Solid Footing

Hand Protection

Crane & Derrick Compliance

Mind Control: Distractions, Stress and Your Ability to Work Safely

Rubber Insulating Line Hose

Procedure for Reducing Injuries

Huskie Tools Opens New Fiberglass Restoration Division

A92.2: The 2009 Standard

Vehicle Operation Winter Readiness

ATV Safety Begins with Proper Training

Innovate or Follow: The Argument Against A Best Practice

Northeast Utilities Takes Safety Off-Road

High-Pressure Hydraulic Injection Injuries

100 Percent Fall Protection: A Joint Union-Management Effort

Crew Foreman Needed: Who Do We Pick?

Behavior Safety: A Safety Program’s Missing Link

Challenges & Successes

Drop Zone Management: Expanding Our View of Line of Fire

Taking Stock of Your Fall Protection Compliance

Live-Line Tool Use and Care

Employee Training: How Hard Can It Be?

Supervisory Skills for Crew Leaders

Equipment: Back to Basics

A Second Look at Safety Glasses

Competition for a Cause

Human Behavior and Communication Skills for Crew Leaders

Cultivating a Mature Workforce

What’s Your Seat Belt IQ?

Substation Safety

No-Voltage Testing

Five PPE Safety Challenges

Safety Circuitry: The Power in the Brain

Arc Flash Exposure Revisited: NESC 2012 Part 4 Update

T&D Best Practices for Crew Leaders

CUSP Basics: Introduction to Human Performance Principles

Felling of Trees Near Power Lines

Working in Winter

Back to the Basics: PPE 101

Hearing Conservation: An Interesting Challenge

T&D Safety Management for Crew Leaders

Basic Qualifications of Employees

FR Layering Techniques

Safety Rules and Work Practices: Why Don’t They Match Up?

Effective Customer Relationships for Crew Leaders

The Value of Safety Certification

Safety Leadership in a Written Pre-Job Briefing

Communication: The Key to Great Safety

Safe Use of Portable Electric Tools, Cords and Generators

Keys to Effective Fall Protection

Integrity and Respect: Two of Our Most Important Tools

The Intersect: A Practical Guide to Work-Site Hazard Analysis

Strategic Safety Partners

Behavior Safety Training for Safety Committee Members

Combating Overuse and Overexertion Injuries

Safe Digging – Get the 411 on 811

Apprenticeship Training

How S.A.F.E.T.Y. Brought Bluebonnet Through the Fires

Formal vs. On-the-Job Training

That’s What I Meant to Say: Safety Leadership in Communication

The Value of Personal Protective Equipment

Safety and Human Performance: You Can’t Have One Without the Other

Oh, No! Changes in the Workplace

Performance Improvement: Barriers to Events

Train the Trainer 101: Ferroresonance Explained

Voice of Experience: Safety Excellence Equals Operational Excellence

A Mirror: Your Most Important PPE

Care of Portable Ladders

Voice of Experience: FMCSR Compliance: Driver Qualification Files

Train the Trainer 101: Enclosed Space Rescue

Keys to Evaluating and Comparing Arc-Rated and Flame-Resistant Fabrics

Raising the Bar, Lowering the EMR

How Six Sigma Can Improve Your Safety Performance

Detecting Shock Hazards at Transmission Line Work Sites

Care and Maintenance of Climbers

Voice of Experience: Are You Ready for the Big Storm?

Train the Trainer 101: Working from Crane-Mounted Baskets

Learning Leadership: The Leadership Paradigm Shift

Are You Prepared for the Next Generation of Lineworkers?

Implementing a Zero Injury Program

Public Safety and Our First Responders

Managing Cold Stress

Live-Line Work on the Jersey Shore

Soil Classification and Excavation Safety

Voice of Experience: The Definition of Personal Protective Equipment

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 1: Self-Awareness

Evaluating Crew Supervisors

Train the Trainer 101: Arc Hazard Protection

NESC and ANSI Z535 Safety Sign Standards for Electric Utility Power Plants and Substations

Working Safely with Chain Saws

The Globally Harmonized System for Classifying and Labeling Chemicals

Voice of Experience: The Cost of Business

Train the Trainer 101: Understanding Grounding for the Protection of All Employees

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 2: Self-Regulation

Occupational Dog Bite Prevention & Safety

Safety Awareness for Substations

Bighorn Sheep vs. Lineworkers: What’s the Difference?

OSHA Job Briefing Basics

Voice of Experience: Training for the Qualified Employee

Train the Trainer 101: ASTM F855 Grounding Equipment Specs Made Simple

Foundation Drilling Safety: The Aldridge Electric Story of Success

The Authority to Stop Work

Starting From the Ground Up

Understanding Step and Touch Potential

Multitasking vs. Switch-Tasking: What’s the Difference?

Voice of Experience: Incidents and the Failure to Control Work

Train the Trainer 101: Live-Line Tool Maintenance Program

Passing the CUSP Exam

Learning Leadership: Leadership Skill Set 4: Social Awareness

Ergonomics for Lineworkers

Are Your Temporary Protective Grounds Really Protecting You?

Voice of Experience: Working On or Near Exposed Energized Parts

Train the Trainer 101: Why You Need More than 1910 and 1926

Transitioning to FR Clothing

Leadership Skill Set 5: Social Persuasion

Safety Management During Change

Spice It Up!

The Singing Lineman

Emergency Action Plans for Remote Locations

Trenching and Excavations: Considerations for the Competent Person

Traffic Safety for Lineworkers

Using Best Practices to Drive Safety Culture

Voice of Experience: The Globally Harmonized System is Here

Train the Trainer 101: Grounding Trucks and Mobile Equipment

The Power of an Effective Field Observation Program

What OSHA’s Proposed Silica Rule Means to You

2013 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Learning Leadership: Personal Protective Emotional Armor: Part 1

Electrical Capacitors in AC Circuits

Improving Safety Through Communication

The Benefits of The CUSP Credential

Voice of Experience: Why Did I Do That?

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Elements for Developing a Safety Culture

Learning Leadership: Personal Protective Emotional Armor: Part 2

Fact-Finding Techniques for Incident Investigations

Electrical Safety for Utility Generation Operations Personnel: A Practical Approach

Addressing Comfort and Contamination in Arc-Rated Clothing

Are You Your Brother’s Keeper?

2013 iP Safety Awards

A Key to Safety Performance Improvement

Salt River Project: Devoted to Safety Excellence

Train the Trainer 101: Safety Incentive Programs

Voice of Experience: OSHA 300 Record-Keeping Rules

Understanding and Influencing the ‘Bulletproof’ Employee

Sustaining Safety Successes

Accident Analysis Using the Multi-Employer Citation Policy

PPE: Much More Than Basic or General Protection

Voice of Experience: Understanding Enclosed and Confined Spaces

Train the Trainer 101: OSHA Forklift Certification Requirements

June 2014 Q&A

Injury Prevention Through Leadership, Employee Engagement and Analytics

NFPA 70E Arc Flash Protection for Nonexempt Industry Workers

The Final Rule

Distributed Generation Safety for Lineworkers

The Perils of Distracted Driving

August 2014 Q&A

Voice of Experience: OSHA Eye and Face Protection Standards

Train the Trainer 101: Fall Protection and the New Rule

Responding to Pole Fires

SRP Rope Access Program Addresses Towers of Power

Elements of an Effective Safety Committee

Mitigating the Risks of Aerial Patrols

Job Briefing for One

Culture Eats Programs for Breakfast

October 2014 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Flame-Resistant Apparel is Now PPE

Train the Trainer 101: Stringing in Energized Environments

The Risks and Rules of Chainsaw Operation

Behavior-Based Safety: What’s the Verdict?

Photovoltaic Solar Safety Management for Utilities

Drones and the Future of Tower Safety

Storytelling as a Management Tool

Safety and Common Sense

Snubbing to Steel Lattice Structures: Lessons Learned

February 2015 Management Toolbox

February 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: The Importance of Job Briefings

Train the Trainer 101: Addressing Anchorages

Recent PPE Changes and 2015 Trends

Growing a Human Performance Culture

Measuring, Planning and Cutting Methods for Chainsaw Operators

The Importance of Matching Evidence Marks in Accident Investigations

Safe By a Nose

Overhead Utility Hazards: Look Up and Live

April 2015 Management Toolbox

April 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: OSHA Updates to Arc-Rated FR Clothing Requirements

Train the Trainer 101: The OSHA-EEI Subpart V Settlement

The Safety Side Effect: How Good Supervisors Coincidentally Improve Safety

Facing Unique Challenges

The Roller-Coaster Life Cycle of IEEE 1307

The Power of Human Intuition

Thirty Years of Personal Perspective

The Most Important Tool on the Job Site

June 2015 Management Toolbox

June 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Fundamentals of Underground Padmount Transformers

Train the Trainer 101: Back to Basics: ‘Gentlemen, This is a Football’

Arrive Alive

How to Navigate the FR Clothing Marketplace

Making the Switch

Understanding OSHA Electric Power Training Requirements

Distribution Switching Safety

Human Performance and a Rat Trap

August 2015 Management Toolbox

August 2015 Q&A

Voice of Experience: Power Generation Safety and the OSHA Update

Stringing Best Practices: Mesh Grips vs. Preforms

Understanding Safety Culture Through Perception Surveys

RF Safety for Utility Workers

2015 USOLN Safety Award Winners Announced

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Underground Safety: Handling Neutrals and Rescue

Voice of Experience: PPE Regulatory and Consensus Standard Requirements

December 2015 Q&A

December 2015 Management Toolbox

The 911 Dilemma

Spotters: A Critical Element of Site Safety

Coping With Industry Changes

The Safety Coaching Observation Process

Fundamentals of Substation Rescue Plans

Recruiting and Training the Next Generation

Shifting Your Organizational Safety Culture

Investigating Industrial Hygiene at Salt River Project

Train the Trainer 101: Practical MAD and Arc Flash Protection

Voice of Experience: Clearing Up Confusion About 1910.269

October 2015 Q&A

October 2015 Management Toolbox

N95 Filtering Face Pieces: Where Does Your Organization Stand?

Stepping Up Steel Safety Education

Rigging Fundamentals for Utilities

Arc Flash Mitigating Technologies and the OSHA Final Rule

Train the Trainer 101: Practical Personal Protective Grounding

OSHA and the Host-Contractor Relationship