Reader Profiles

Building an effective safety culture requires strong safety leadership.  The iP reader profiles features utility industry safety managers who know what it takes to overcome obstacles that brings their workers home each and every day.

Do you know of a safety leader that Incident Prevention should profile?  Send us an email and we'll get their story of  challenges and ultimate success published in the magazine!

FREE Subscription to iP Magazine. We'll send you 6 issues a year at no charge!


Portland-Banner

Sunday, 01 October 2006 13:55

Top Five PPE Mistakes

Written by  Hugh Hoagland

Identifying PPE Mistakes in Electric Arc Flash Programs

After a decade of electric arc testing, incident investigations and incident replications using electric arcs, a few lessons have emerged as critical in assessing a Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) program:

1. PPE ISN'T WORN
Whether it's because of a lack of training about its importance, a policy that says, "Wear it when you need it," or because the right suit is not being provided for the job, PPE does no good if it isn't being used. Most accidents happen when workers think they don't need the protection. Are you simply buying the least expensive suit? While some companies believe that more is better and provide heavy, uncomfortable PPE, less can actually be better. The largest difference in FR clothing is the difference between non-FR and FR. To worry about the difference between a 100 cal/cm2 suit and a 40 cal/cm2 suit is to miss the point. Many companies will provide 100 cal/cm2 suits, which are not worn. It's better to have a worker in a 4 cal/cm2 shirt and an FR jean than in cotton because they didn't want to wear the heavier suit all day.
Less expensive suits are heavier in weight than other suits but are a great value if workers are wearing them for a short time, such as for routine switching for a few minutes. If your workers are working in flash suits more than 10 to 15 minutes per day consider a lightweight, highly protective suit, which meets 40 to 65 cal/cm2 but weighs in at less than half the common suits on the market. Adding venting technologies may add only $100 to the cost of the suit, but it can also make a huge difference in worker comfort. Other options include PAPR-type devices, which can also filter air if your exposure requires it. Field trial your choices to see how they perform. Considering cost and comfort will increase worker compliance.

2. FR IS NOT FR ALL THE TIME
FR acrylics, FR nylons and FR polyesters are not really FR for most practical purposes. These materials should have another name because "flame resistant" by definition gives the end user the wrong impression. They may be fine for a worker who has little or no flame exposure, but they are worse than useless in electric arc situations where supposed FR products can melt to workers. FR products should be avoided unless they meet truly arc resistant ASTM standards. Other flame resistant standards are useless in electric arc. Here are the standards to specify:
• Clothing — ASTM F1506
• Rainwear — ASTM F1891
• Hoods and Face Shields — ASTM F2178
• Fall Protection Exposed to Electric Arc — ASTM F887
• Gloves — ASTM D120
• Flash Fire Clothing — NFPA 2112, CGSB 155.20.

3. USING FR RAINWEAR RATHER THAN ARC THERMAL RESISTANT RAINWEAR
Make sure you have the right raingear, which means only rainwear that complies with ASTM F1891 or NFPA 2112. Arc Thermal Resistant rainwear is usually built on DuPont's Nomex(r) or Kevlar(r) or a blend of both. Nylon or polyester, even if labeled "FR," are usually not acceptable in rainwear when exposed to electric arc.

4. USING NON-FR JACKETS AND WINTER WEAR OVER FR AND THINKING IT IS OK
An FR shirt under a heavy flammable jacket will not provide protection. Winter wear that does not meet ASTM F1506 is inadequate for electric arc exposure. In two accidents I have helped to investigate, a heavy non-FR winter jacket burned workers under their FR clothing to 60% body burn or greater, life threatening in most cases. Westex's InduraT ModaQuiltT has been used successfully for years and the new 3M FR Thinsulate is just coming on the market in FR winter wear.

5. NO TRAINING ON UNDERGARMENTS
In order the meet the NFPA 70E standard, workers are required to wear non-melting natural fiber clothing at a minimum or FR underwear. Flame resistant bras and other undergarments are now commercially available. Avoid new wickable melting T-shirts and wickable, meltable underwear. These materials should not be part of undergarments in arc or flame situations. Plain cotton, FR wool and silk are all good options for winter undergarments or FR T-shirts made from Indura UltraSoft(r) Knits, Springfield's FireWear(r), ITI's EMCT, SSM's ProC FRT or various Nomex(r) Knits.

Simplifying your arc flash PPE program by using daily wear with 4 to 8 cal/cm2 and adding an arc flash rain suit, an additional coverall or a lightweight flash suit with a flash suit hood makes a well-rounded program easier to live with and work in. ip

Hugh Hoagland performs arc flash hazard assessments and calculations, training, accident investigation, testing and other services related to electric arc exposure for companies around the world. You may reach him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Last modified on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 12:19
Hugh Hoagland

Hugh Hoagland

Hugh Hoagland is among the world's foremost experts on electrical arc testing and safety. His career change began with safety testing at LG&E Energy, later, he worked as R & D Director for NASCO, a manufacturer of protective outerwear solutions. He has helped develop most of the arc-resistant rainwear used in the world today as well as creating the first face shield to protect against electric arcs.

Before moving to full-time training and consulting. Hugh worked for Cintas developing their strategy for meeting the needs of OSHA 1910.269 and NFPA 70E standards before moving to full time training and consulting. He has helped development of legislation and standards in both the US and Europe. He sits on several industry committees and is a featured speaker at safety conferences and events.

Meet Our Experts

Website: www.e-hazard.com/

1 Comment

  • Comment Link Robert N. Haunton Wednesday, 22 February 2012 18:23 posted by Robert N. Haunton

    I am the Operations Manager for a large Facilities Maintenance Contractor that works for the Government. A couple of years back we had a Substation blow an XLP Cable, which destroyed the substation. Fortunately, nobody was injured. The Government hired a firm to conduct an ARC Flash Analysis that would be used to determine the level of PPE that was required for our personnel to work safely in substations going forward. Thus far they have not produced the Analysis, but want my guys to go back into the Substation while doning a 100 cal suit. They say that OSHA/NFPA-70E states that in the absence of a completed ARC Flash Study that in order to conduct maintenance in a substation you need to revert to the highest level of protection (i.e. 100 call suits). Is this the case? I can not find any reference to this in either directive. Thanks for your assistance

Leave a comment

FREE Subscription to iP Magazine.
We'll send you 6 issues a year at no charge!

Latest Tailgate Topics


Combating Overuse and Overexertion Injuries
This month’s Tailgate focuses on what we can do to combat overuse and overexertion injuries. As every utility employee knows, our work at times is hard, dirty and dangerous. The demands of our job require much physical wo...
Safe Use of Portable Electric Tools, Cords and Generators
This month’s Tailgate is a review of some basic safety precautions to take when using portable electric tools and equipment. The focus is on prevention of electrical shock, specifically when using 120-volt AC portable ele...
Communication: The Key to Great Safety
You’re a crew leader or even a supervisor and you really know your stuff, yet your crews aren’t quite following your direction. Something is amiss, but you can’t figure it out. Or maybe you’re a journeyman lineman, ...

Latest iP Articles


Behavior Safety Training for Safety Committee Members
Industries concerned about bottom-line expenses tend to place behavior safety training low on the priority list. However, consider the direct costs your company paid for incidents, accidents, injuries, lost time, lost produ...
Strategic Safety Partners
In 2004, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) entered into the Electrical Transmission & Distribution (ET&D) Strategic Partnership agreement with six electrical contractors: Asplundh Tree Expert ...
The Intersect: A Practical Guide to Work-Site Hazard Analysis
A hazard is essentially a condition or activity that, if left uncontrolled, may result in an accident or a serious injury. To effectively identify hazards, the observer must develop a means of recognizing a hazard exposure....
Integrity and Respect: Two of Our Most Important Tools
Few things are more difficult to establish or easier to lose than integrity. As safety professionals, if our workers, bosses and peers see us as people of integrity, we can ask things of them with a very real expectation th...
Keys to Effective Fall Protection
The electric utility industry is loaded with potential hazards. Climbing at heights is one of those inherent safety risks that come with the job. At Louisville Gas and Electric (LG&E) and Kentucky Utilities (KU), we req...

Most Popular Articles


Incident Analysis
The essence of safety is preventing incidents from having the opportunity to occur. When they do occur, it is usually the result of one or more safety systems failures. Failures, however, are the seeds of opportunity. Incid...
Top Five PPE Mistakes
Identifying PPE Mistakes in Electric Arc Flash Programs After a decade of electric arc testing, incident investigations and incident replications using electric arcs, a few lessons have emerged as critical in assessing a ...
When is a Lineman a Lineman?
This feature's title is not a rhetorical question. There really should be an answer-a definitive, widely accepted answer we could all give quickly and consistently. There isn't and we can't, though we try with great confide...
Effective Fall Protection for Utility Workers
A review of the relevant standards and training that companies need to provide. ...

Search

Tailgate Safety

Sign Up for Tailgate Safety E-Newsletter
Sponsors are Key to the Success of Incident Prevention
DBI Sala
Glove Guard
Institute for Safety in Powerline Construction - Lineman Safety and Training
Pelsue
Utility Jobs Online